ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the resistance rate and to correlate the clinical characteristics of resistant tuberculosis with the patients of pulmonary tuberculosis who were referred to the university hospital. METHODS: We prospectively performed sensitivity tests for all patients who were diagnosed as active tuberculosis by sputum smear or sputum culture from January, 1995 to June, 1996. Patients profile, previous treatment history, patterns of drug resistance, initial chest films and other clinical findings were analysed. RESULTS: Overall, 24(26.0%) of the 92 patients had resistance to at least one drug and 8(8.6%) had resistance to isoniazid(INH) and rifampin(RFP). Among the 66 patients without previous tuberculosis therapy, 11(16.6%) were drug-resistant and 2(3.0%) were multi-drug resistant. Among the 26 patients with previous therapy, 13(50.0%) were drug-resistant and 6(23.0%) were multi-drug resistant. For all 92, resistance to INH was most common (19.5%), followed by RFP (9.7%) and ethambutol (9.7%). Drug resistance was significantly high in previously treated patients and in cavity-positive patients. Treatment failure was also high in previously treated patients with resistant tuberculosis. In patients with primary resistance, treatment failure was not observed. CONCLUSION: Sensitivity tests are strongly recommended in all culture positive patients with previous therapy but, in patients with primary resistance, sensitivity tests are not required. Proper combination chemotherapy should be given under careful surveillance.
Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Adolescent , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Hospitals, University , Korea/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/epidemiology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/epidemiology , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Known as a kind of complication or a specific form of pulmonary tuberculosis, endobronchial tuberculosis caused several kinds of problems in diagnosis and managements. But the frequency of this disease are is widely variable, generally reported from as low as 10 - 20% to as high as 40 - 50%. We prospectively performed bronchoscopy in patients diagnosed as pulmonary tuberculosis to evaluate the frequency of endobronchial tuberculosis and its related findings. METHOD: From March, 1995 to February, 1996, we prospectively performed bronchoscopy in patients newly diagnosed as pulmonary tuberculosis and evaluated the frequency of endobronchial tuberculosis, its clinical features and laboratory findings including raiologic, microbiologic and physiologic aspects. RESULTS: Number of patients diagnosed as pulmonary tuberculosis was 103 and 55 patients(53.4%) were found to have endobronchial tuberculosis. But the frequency were 43.8% in male and 76.7% in female, respectively. Frequently noted symtoms were nonspecific including cough, sputum, fever, weight loss in the order of frequency but cough was more frequent than in pulmonary tuberculosis. Physical examination showed rale,decreased breathing sound and wheezing and wheezing was more frequent than in pulmonary tuberculosis. All 7 subtypes were noted bronchoscopically and edema-hyperemia (stenotic without fibrosis) type was most frequently(32.7%) noted, and followed by chronic nonspecific bronchitis type stenotic with fibrosis type and actively caseating type in the order of frequency. The relationship between subtypes of endobronchial tuberculosis and radiologic findings was insignificant. Right lung was involved more frequently than left lung and left upper lobe was most commonly involved site, and followed by right upper lobe and trachea. Acid-fast bacilli(AFB) positivity in sputum and / or bronchial washing fluid was 73% and suggested high risk of infectivity. CONCLUSION: The frequency of endobronchial tuberculosis in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis was higher than known and also suggested bronchoscopic examination to detect endobronchial involvement should be recommanded and careful management is also needed to prevent complications.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Bronchitis , Bronchoscopy , Cough , Diagnosis , Fever , Fibrosis , Lung , Physical Examination , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Sounds , Sputum , Trachea , Tuberculosis , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary , Weight LossABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: One quarter to one third of patients with NSCLC present with primary tumors that although confined to the thorax are too extensive for surgical resection. Until resently standard treatment for these patients had been thoracic radiation, which produces tumor regression in most patients but few cures and dismal 5-year survival rate. The fact that death for most patients with stage III tumors is caused by distant metastases has promped a reevaluation of combined modality treatment approaches that include systemic chemotherapy. Therefore, we report the results observed in a study to evaluate the effect of multimodality treatment in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer from 1/91 to 8/93 in CNUH. METHOD: We grouped the patients according to the treatment modalities and evaluated response rate, median survival and the effect of prognostic variables. Among 67 patients evaluated, twenty seven patients classified with group A, received cisplatin and etoposide containing combination chemotherapy alone, eighteen patients, classified with group B, received chemotherapy and radiotherapy, fifteen patients, group C, received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery with/without radiation therapy, seven patients, group D, received only supportive care. RESULT: The major response rate for group A and B was 37% and 61% respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in response rate between A and B groups(p=0.97). The analysis of prognostic factors showed that differences of age, sex, pathology, blood type, smoking year, stage and ECOG performance did not related to improvement in survival. Median survival time was 8.6 months for group A, 13.4 months for group B, 19.2 months for group C, and 5.4 months for group D, respectively and there was statistically significant difference(p=0.003), suggesting that multimodality therapy was associated with signigicant improvement in survival. Subset survival analysis showed a significant therapeutic effect for earlier stage and good performance state(p=0.007, 0.009, respectively). A possible survival advantages were observed for major response groups. CONCLUSION: It was suggested that multimodality therapy for the management of patients who had stage III disease, has yielded good median survival and long survival for seleted patients. But, it is necessory to validate above result with further investigation in large scale and in prospective randomized trials.